Economist David R. Barker argued that the U.S. federal government did not achieve a positive financial return on the purchase of Alaska. According to Mr. Barker, tax revenues and mineral and energy royalties to the federal government were lower than the federal costs of the Alaska administration, plus interest on the borrowed funds used for the purchase.  Many Americans believed in 1867 that the buying process had been corrupt, but W. H. Dall wrote in 1872 that “… There is no doubt that the feelings of a majority of U.S. citizens are favorable… referring to the purchase of Russia`s territories in America.  The idea that buying was unpopular with Americans is, writes one scholar 120 years later, “one of the strongest historical myths in American history. Despite conclusive evidence to the contrary, there is the efforts of the best historians to disperse it, “probably in part because it corresponds to the vision of American writers and Alaska on the ground as self-reliant individuals filled with autonomous pioneers.
 Six years later, a description of events was published in Finland. It was written by a blacksmith named T. Ahllund, who had been recruited to work in Sitka: Russia had established a presence in North America in the first half of the 18th century, but few Russians ever settled in Alaska. After the Crimean War, Emperor Alexander II of Russia began exploring the possibility of selling Alaska, which would be difficult to defend in an upcoming war before the conquest of Britain, the main Russian rival. After the end of the American Civil War, U.S. Secretary of State William Seward opened negotiations with Russian Minister Eduard de Stoeckl on the purchase of Alaska. Seward and Stoeckl agreed on a treaty on March 30, 1867, and the treaty was ratified by afar by the U.S. Senate. On March 30, 1867, the United States entered into an agreement to purchase Alaska from Russia for $7.2 million.
The treaty with Russia was negotiated and signed by Secretary of State William Seward and Russian Minister of the United States, Edward de Stoeckl. Critics of the Alaskan purchase agreement called it “Seward`s Folly” or “Seward`s Icebox.” Resistance to the purchase of Alaska eased with the Klondike Gold Strike in 1896. Publication of the real estate transfer will bemate. (STAND 34.70.010-34.70.200) In Alaska, the property disclosure form must be completed by the seller and given to the buyer. Subsequently, the agreement is considered legally binding. In the winter of 1859-60 de Stoeckl held meetings with U.S. officials, although he was ordered not to initiate discussions on the sale of CAR assets.