It is advisable to work with integrity for an additional 5 months in order to meet the terms of engagement bearing in mind that you work for the organization and not for the team leader or your colleagues. At first it was a crime under the law, but now, if the employee is not satisfied with the organization, he can break the employment link. The organization cannot ask the employee for money or anything else. However, the terms of an agreement directly or indirectly requiring the worker to serve the employer or a restriction on membership of competitors or other similar employers in the sector are not valid under Indian law. Lawyer Sunil Agarkar has obtained his law degree from Gujarat and has practiced with discernment for more than 15 years and serves as a legal fraternity at the Supreme Court of Gujarat. He is professionally involved in criminal and civil law cases, which includes labour law, labour law, computer and cyber legislation, intellectual property laws, arbitration, family law, consumer affairs, divorce issues, social affairs and the development and verification of various agreements and documents. Lawyer Sunil Agarkar is a respected lawyer in Vadodara and has enriched with the implementation of the latest case study and research. It practices and handles cases independently with a results-based approach and believes that appropriate legal advice can be given to a client and a party to the process after review of the entire issue. Its approach for all its clients is to offer practical and legal solutions to all their cases. If it`s a routine service link, don`t worry, nothing will happen. But if they have spent money/special efforts on you with respect to a specific clause in the obligation, they have the right to recover the money from you, legally. Although the loan, which each organization has signed with an employee, is null and void according to the Constitution of India, but the employer can take action against you for recovery and terms of engagement until judicial judgment. From the case told, you have to work with the same company for an additional five months to meet the borrowing requirements and some team leaders do not behave properly with you.
Forcing new entrants into a loan period is not legal and the validity of employment obligations can be challenged on the basis of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act. In itself, the obligation to use employment is legal in India. The condition is that it does not violate Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act. In addition, borrowing should be reasonable, clear and unambiguous. I suggest that you do not send a response to the legal reference. If the company takes action, it may be challenged in court that the loan was inappropriate and contained abusive conditions. 3) However, to the extent that it is the payment of one month`s salary, if you leave the organization within 3 years without notice, it is valid. Companies that have fought through legal proceedings know this, but can sign a loan with indirect threats to retain their employees.
Most bonds are illegal. Even under the law, the government and the PSUs have lost cases on this issue. 4) The payment clause – as liquidated damages if you leave the organization within 3 years, would be difficult to implement if the company did not spend any amount on your training. Did you send a written notification to the organization before you left the workstation? 1) The contractual terms that prevent you from joining another company for a period of one year are invalid. 3. It is in your best interest to transfer to the company the salary corresponding to the 3 weeks notice, the Company being required to submit the discharge letter to you. While many organizations do not insist on de-cluttering the letters of former employers, professional companies insist that the former employer`s letters be unloaded to ensure that the way out of previous jobs was appropriate.